Drinks with David; My New Political Talk Show

The Problem:

Hyper-partisan, demagogic, damn-near un-watchable political talk shows and their corrosive effect on political discourse.

My relationship to political talk shows of any sort in any medium could be described using an SAT analogy:

Maus:Political Talk Shows::The World’s Most Interesting Man:Beer

That is to say I don’t often watch them.  The equivalent of Dos Equis would be those interviews that just sound so intriguing that I have to watch the clips online later, such as Lupe Fiasco on the O’Reilly Factor or Cornel West and Mos Def appearing together on Bill Maher.  But usually whenever I watch any sort of political talk show, I feel discouraged about humanity and annoyed at all the shouting.

Here is the question I asked myself last week, after a spirited, but ultimately amicable political discussion with my dad and uncle:

Why is it that ordinary people can have such discussions without descending into shouting and name-calling, but the professionals on TV can’t?

Part of the answer is that the people on TV aren’t like you and me or the family and friends with whom these discussions take place.  Oftentimes the people on TV have a sense of self-importance that makes them feel entitled to never be interrupted or corrected, and a need to verbally bludgeon anyone who deigns to do so.


I think an equally important reason is that the “debates” on political talk shows don’t happen under the same circumstances as those with friends and family.  The context of a discussion probably does more to shape its tone than the content. Think back to college and how a discussion about the exact same topic would play out in a classroom versus in a dorm.

This leads me to my grand idea for a show:

Drinks With David

The most important element of the show will be the set: instead of having one one of those big circular desks in the studio with a backlit world map, oversize monitors or some other gaudy backdrop, I would have two (or maybe three) comfy chairs in the center of the stage and a bar off to the side.

Exchange the bookshelf for a bar and the desk for a living room set

When I introduce the guest (usually some political figure) I would meet them at the bar, and we’d chit-chat while the bartender (whose character for the show could be developed) got our drinks.  We wouldn’t discuss anything political until we had our drinks and were sitting in the comfy chairs.

Hopefully the relaxed atmosphere would make for less heated exchanges, and having a drink together would make the conversation seem more like just that — a conversation.

Usually I hope someone with the means to actualize will still my ideas, but truthfully, I would be kind of jealous if someone else actually gets to host a show like this.


5 responses to “Drinks with David; My New Political Talk Show

  1. Scott Wheeler

    Perhaps you should just start doing it. Record some webisodes and put them on youtube and see if they catch on. Of course, you’d have to get interesting people to agree to the interviews…but it could happen. May be tricky while you’re in Africa, though.

  2. No, not tricky in Africa – Just think of all the interesting show guests you could have in Uganda.

  3. David, I hereby state my intent to audition for the bartender position, hoping that nepotism will reign in the selection process. I solemnly swear to assent to the stated requirement for character development in keeping with the tone of the show, on the condition that my views, based on past and present personal experience, observation of what works and what doesn’t, and bits of horse sense will be broadcast without suppression, editing, shouting down, or other forms of censorship. I’m trusting that all travel expenses to Uganda will be covered by the show. If not, perhaps the initial episodes could be aired during our upcoming visit, and if sponsors flood your coffers and demand my continuing presence, that suitable contracts could be agreed upon. Such a deal would, of course, be cinched in the comfy chairs after a meeting at the bar.

  4. I never thought you would be the one to pitch a can’t miss TV show. This is pure brilliance!

  5. David,

    I often ask myself the same sort of question. In addition to promoting unbalanced analysis and employing fear tactics to increase viewership, the prohibition of academics within mainstream media has academic implications as well. The implications are essentially circular: “No one gives a shit about what we think/research/are experts on, so we’ll research even more obscure topics that will result in the further alienation of academics.” It only gets worse when individuals (such as the honorable Senator from Oklahoma) deem political science unworthy of receiving NSF grants. So not even policy makers (who should care about our research) actually do.

    So…give the smart folks comfy chairs and beer. We’re generally more likable (though perhaps less coherent) when we’re intoxicated–certainly we’re less annoying than Rachel Maddow.

    Terilyn 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s